−71%
False positives
+18 pts
Recall uplift
USD 24M
Annualised fraud avoided
90 d
To first typology in production
Client
Leading Middle East Bank
Sector
Banking & Financial Services
Duration
7 months
Team
24 specialists
01 · The challenge

Problem

Fraud false-positive rate ran at 9.4%, swamping the operations team. Real fraud was missed in the noise. Customer complaints about blocked transactions were rising.

02 · How we delivered

Solution

Real-time AI fraud platform with feature store, graph-based risk scoring, and analyst copilot for case triage. Live-parallel against existing rules engine for 8 weeks.

03 · Outcome

Impact

False-positive rate cut 71%. Recall up 18 percentage points. USD 24M of annualised fraud avoided in year one. 4 fraud typologies live in 90 days.

How we delivered

Programme phases.

Five phases. One accountable team. Every phase had a named decision point and a measurable outcome.

Discovery & alignment

2–3 weeks

Workshops with the Leading Middle East Bank executive team, baseline metrics, target outcome tree, programme governance set up.

Design & architecture

4–6 weeks

Reference architecture, security blueprint, joint squad model agreed. Data model and integration contracts published.

Build & live-parallel

Q2 onwards

Vertical slice built and run live-parallel against the existing system. Continuous integration, daily deploys, weekly business demos.

Cutover & scale

Mid-programme

Phased cutover, audit-aligned reconciliation, scaling out of squads, capability transfer to Leading Middle East Bank teams.

Run & continuous improve

Steady state

Managed run with named SLOs, quarterly value reviews, and a 15% optimisation budget reserved for improvement work.

Engineering view

Architecture overview.

Foundations

Cloud landing zone, identity, network, security baseline. Data fabric with lineage-by-default. Audit-grade observability stack from day one.

Application & integration

Domain-aligned microservices behind a published API surface. Event-driven core with CDC into the data fabric. Live-parallel capability built in, not bolted on.

Trust & governance

RBAC, audit logs, lineage, policy-as-code. Model risk records for every production model. Compliance posture on the executive dashboard, not in a quarterly slide.

Built on

Technology stack.

Production-grade choices, defended by track record. The stack is one engineering decision among many — but a load-bearing one.

AWS Snowflake Tecton XGBoost Anthropic Claude Datadog
Trust by design

Governance & assurance.

01

Programme assurance

Independent assurance reviews at each phase gate. Findings tracked in a single risk register with named owners and remediation deadlines.

02

Security & data

ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II controls applied throughout. Data lineage captured by default; sensitive data tokenised at the edge.

03

Model risk management

SR 11-7-aligned model risk record per production model. Audit-trail evidencing model behaviour against benchmarks at the decision level.

04

Regulator engagement

Quarterly briefings to the regulator with reproducible explainability artefacts. First-attempt acceptance is the default expectation.

The analyst copilot changed our operating model. We do more, with less noise.

H Head of Financial Crime · Leading Middle East Bank

What we learnt

Three things we would do again.

  1. 01

    7 months from kickoff to first regulated outcome — squad density and decision velocity matter more than headcount.

  2. 02

    Joint squads with Leading Middle East Bank engineers stayed in place after go-live. Ownership did not transfer in a hand-off — it grew in place.

  3. 03

    Live-parallel for a meaningful window before cutover bought us trust. The cutover itself was a flag flip, not a war room.

Book the partner

Want a programme like this one?

Tell us your sector and your timeline. A senior partner with sector experience will respond within one business day.